The Real Miracle of Pope John Paul

The Washington Post recently published an article asking, in light of Pope Francis fast-tracking Pope John Paul's sainthood, how "miraculous" should modern saints be? 

Miracles, really?  

John Paul's "miracles" are that he supposedly cured a French nun of Parkinson's in 2005, several months after he himself died. His second miracle was curing a Costa Rican woman of an aneurism in 2011, six full years after his death.  The obvious response by any cynic is that John Paul's "miracles" occurring after his death are an awfully convenient excuse for the "modern" church to avoid that pesky problem called proof. After all faith has never been an act of intelligence or logic. Faith is an act of the imagination. So John Paul performed miracles from the grave. Why the hell not? Who am I to say he didn't? 

But there is a bigger issue here than whether or not the old Pope performed magic from the grave and if his body of work merits induction into the Jesus Hall of Fame.  

Maybe it's time the Vatican puts a moratorium on granting Sainthood to anyone at all unless the "miracle" they perform involves ending the practice of priests sexually abusing young boys, exposing those priests who commit these crimes rather than looking the other way, and putting some of the vast wealth in the Vatican bank account towards helping the victims of childhood sexual abuse. 

Let's set reason and logic aside and presume we all agree that John Paul waved his magic wand from the grave and miraculously cured the French nun's Parkinson's and the Costa Rican woman's aneurism. Do these two acts plus his 27 years as head of the Catholic church really trump the blind eye he turned to the sexual crimes committed in HIS church by HIS priests against thousands of young boys? I mean, isn't the real miracle here that someone capable of channeling the power of God to heal people from the grave was somehow completely ignorant to the atrocities in his own church?